Global Veterinary Intelligence
Reader login
Veterinary33Canada

Free reader access

Every article remains open. Registration is for participation, not access.

Create a profile to comment, join discussions, receive more relevant recommendations, keep your activity connected, and access selected opportunities.

Article · Clinical Study · 2 min read

Randomised clinical trial comparing intramuscular alfaxalone and butorphanol sedation with or without midazolam in hyperthyroid cats.

Loading views…

Clinical evidence update from Journal of feline medicine and surgery

August 24, 2026 at 12:00 PM UTCJournal of feline medicine and surgeryVeterinary33 Editorial Desk

Comments on this article are also part of the Veterinary33 clinical forum.

Randomised clinical trial comparing intramuscular alfaxalone and butorphanol sedation with or without midazolam in hyperthyroid cats.

Clinical Context

Peer-reviewed veterinary literature continues to shape everyday decision-making for feline patients, especially when new evidence clarifies diagnosis, treatment selection, monitoring, or clinical outcomes.

What the Study Evaluated

A study published in Journal of feline medicine and surgery in 2025 evaluated randomised clinical trial comparing intramuscular alfaxalone and butorphanol sedation with or without midazolam in hyperthyroid cats..

Key Findings

ObjectivesThe sedation quality of intramuscular (IM) alfaxalone and butorphanol in combination with midazolam was investigated in hyperthyroid cats undergoing suitability assessment for radioiodine treatment.MethodsA total of 60 hyperthyroid cats undergoing diagnostic investigations were randomly allocated to receive butorphanol (0.3 mg/kg IM) and midazolam (0.2 mg/kg IM) with either alfaxalone (2 mg/kg IM) (BMA2) or alfaxalone (3 mg/kg IM) (BMA3), or butorphanol (0.3 mg/kg IM) with alfaxalone (3 mg/kg IM) (BA3). If required, additional alfaxalone (0.2 mg/kg) was administered intravenously. Cat Stress Score, response to injection, time to...

Why It Matters for Veterinary Professionals

For veterinary professionals, the practical value of this work lies in how the findings may support more structured clinical assessment, clearer monitoring, and more informed decisions for feline patients.

Practical Interpretation

The results should be interpreted in the context of the study design, population, inclusion criteria, and clinical setting. Application in practice should consider patient-specific risk factors, available diagnostics, local standards of care, and clinician judgment.

Clinical Takeaway

Overall, the study adds useful evidence for clinicians seeking to align daily practice with current veterinary research while maintaining a balanced, case-by-case approach.

Read the full article here.

Join this discussion

Add your reply

Share a professional insight, ask a focused question, or add relevant clinical experience.

Member participation

Log in to join the discussion

Share an answer, ask a question, reply to another professional, or mark useful contributions as helpful.

Log in to reply

Continue the conversation

Share this article with another veterinary professional.

LinkedInEmail
Articles remain free

Create a profile when you are ready to participate.

Veterinary33 does not require registration to read its articles. A free reader profile connects your discussions, recommendations, professional details, and reader activity.

After registration or login, you will return to this exact article.

Registered readers may also receive selected educational and community opportunities.

Join discussions

Comment on articles and participate in professional conversations.

Relevant recommendations

Use your reading and engagement activity to surface more useful articles.

Connected reader activity

Return to your likes, comments, discussions, and article activity in one place.

Professional profile

Add your profession, specialty, workplace, biography, and profile image.

Registration is optional

Continue reading